Concrete evidence

There is now concrete scientific evidence emerging that the three skyscrapers which fell on 9/11 were controlled demolitions. Leaving aside the many arguments surrounding motive and method, the architects and engineers who have been investigating have some solid facts about the pieces of the buildings which were rescued, and also some dust which was sent by local residents in New York. This interview (3 parts) with the very believable and non tin-hatted Richard Gage lays some of it out.
Of course the real problem is the media. As he points out, 90% of the tv/radio/papers is controlled by those with a vested interest in control of oil and prolonged wars, and getting anyone in the mainstream to take a risk on blowing this wide open is a real struggle. Hence the growing grassroots campaign by people like the architects, and we are change, who are taking it onto the streets and confronting those in power. The constant argument from the supporters of the official conspiracy story too, is that someone would have blown the whistle. How pray, when the media are tied up tight as I just said? Who would confess to mass murder anyway, or complicity? And the number of people needed to achieve it would have been frighteningly small - the military has a structure of compartmentalisation which enables each person to carry out orders which are trickled down from above without comprehending what the bigger picture is. This method can be used in any large operation. Add to this the fact that on 9/11 there was a massive exercise simulating terror attacks (vigilant guardian) which would have provided an explanation to the vast majority of those involved of most things which were out of the ordinary, at least until the reality of the situation became clear.
My previous post about Jim Corr provides some of the much wider picture which you need to begin to grasp if the sense of all of this is to become clear. What is going on beneath the radar? How do we place things like the 42 days vote in parliament this week in all this? Is it relevant?
Did you know, for instance, that near Washington this weekend there is a large, secret meeting of 140 of the world's most influential people (the list itself makes fascinating reading), discussing we know not what, because it is completely absent from our news? Does it matter? I believe it does.